Working SessionLucy Howell × Amber Smith
2026-04-28
Pipeline Connects × Force for Health Network

Partnership & Funding Roadmap

A do-paid-business-together blueprint: protect Pipeline's reach, replace Pipeline's cliff funding with FFH-led prime contracts, and build a co-commercialized "My Healthy Arizona" with equity upside as we scale beyond the state.

Date2026-04-28
AuthorsCoach Lucy & FFH Virtual C-Suite
Working draft forAmber Smith, CEO, Pipeline Connects
TaglineLearn It. Live It. Share It.

1The Strategic Frame

Pipeline has the data, the reach, and the relationships. FFH has the activation engine, the outcomes layer, and a path to equity. Together we close two gaps Arizona cannot close on its own: workforce readiness and population health.

What Pipeline brings

  • 300K+ active learners on platform (170K HS, 30K adult, 30K job-seekers)
  • ECAP — the statewide Education & Career Action Plan distribution channel
  • 6 active white-labels generating recurring revenue (Maricopa, Chandler, Mesa, My Futures + 2 sub-domains)
  • Burning Glass Institute Skills First Fellowship inside track
  • Trusted brand across 15 Arizona counties + 22 Tribal Nations
  • Rural Community Specialist (Nogales) — already hired

What Force for Health brings

  • 360° Health Academy — 1,800+ lessons, 11 body systems, bilingual, NHES/NGSS/CASEL aligned
  • Reality Health Games — engagement engine that retains learners after the assessment
  • PHIT Score & Data Hub — 141 panels, 107 API connections, county-level outcomes
  • Chamber of Health Systems — convening table at the state and regional level
  • Owned tech stack (Vercel + Supabase + custom) — white-label clone in <30 min
  • Foundation + for-profit structure — accepts both grant and equity capital cleanly
The combined story: The Bloomberg of population health (FFH) bolted to the Bloomberg of Arizona's talent pipeline (Pipeline + BGI/Lightcast underneath, OR an FFH-owned skills graph — see §9). One partner makes the youth healthier and prepared; the other makes the path to a job real and trackable. The pitch to every Arizona funder is now both/and, not either/or.

2Why Now — The Two Clocks We're Racing

Pipeline has 6 months of runway. FFH has a market window in front of TRIF, ABOR, RHT, ACE, and the Arizona Healthcare Workforce Action Group. The same partnership solves both problems.

Pipeline's clock

$16M total funding since 2015 — $7M PEI/Maricopa Industrial Authority, $1M ACCHHS, $5M K-12 (DOE), $3M DOL. Most was development pass-through, not sustaining operating revenue.

$1.5M annual to sustain — $35K/month tech platform + 6.5 FTE (incl. new Rural Community Specialist).

Funding dries up Nov 2026. Pipeline's founder is now Chief of Staff in the Governor's Office. Amber is "saving the ship" and was told she'd be better positioned as a vendor inside a broader solution.

FFH / Arizona's clock

TRIF FY27 ABOR priorities are open — AMPLA ($30M), Arizona Promise ($50M), AFESF ($10M), Excellence Scholarship ($20M). Chair-Elect explicitly invited innovative public-private partnerships.

Arizona ACE Initiative + Chamber of Health Directors Table + Rural Health Tour (RHT) are forming the convening layer — FFH already has a seat; Amber should sit there too, with us. Front-facing AZ Chamber of Health page is live.

OEO ($M-scale grant authority) is actively seeking solutions — but Pipeline can't lead because of perceived conflict of interest. We can.

3The Three-Layer Stack — How We Don't Squash Pipeline's Product

Pipeline isn't competing with FFH. Pipeline is the middle layer. We're building a stack where each partner does what they do best, and every layer below it gets stronger.

Layer 3 — Activation & Outcomes
Force for Health Network
360° Academy + Reality Health Games + PHIT Score + Chamber of Health Systems. Health citizenship education, gamified engagement, county-level health outcomes, employer-validated micro-credentials, AI tutoring (Virtual Dr. Rob + Coach Lucy), and the data layer that proves outcomes back to funders, employers, and EHRs.
Layer 2 — Pathway Catalog & Reach
Pipeline Connects
ECAP, course/career catalog, skills assessment, 300K-learner distribution. Pipeline stays the front door for "what comes next" — students take an assessment, see Arizona-specific pathways, and get routed to apprenticeships, CTE, JTED, postsecondary, and FFH content. Pipeline's whitelabels (Maricopa, Chandler, Mesa, My Futures) keep running and grow.
Layer 1 — Labor Market Intelligence
Lightcast OR FFH-Owned Graph
Two viable architectures here — see Section 9. Path A licenses Lightcast (the data engine behind 44 of Fortune 50) + Burning Glass Institute Skills First framework. Path B builds an FFH-owned skills + occupation graph using O*NET, BLS, AZ DES, and Pipeline ECAP data — zero licensing cost, owned IP, but 6–9 months of dev. We can also stage: Path A Year 1, Path B by Year 2.
Lightcast positioning resolved: Lightcast is an API partner candidate, not a default rival. Burning Glass Technologies + Emsi merged to form Lightcast in 2022; "Burning Glass Institute" is the separate research arm running the Skills First Fellowship. Pipeline brings BGI in through the front door. Whether we layer Lightcast underneath FFH or build our own is a strategic budget call — see §9 for the full comparison and pricing.

4The COI Mitigation Architecture

The conflict of interest is real and it's not Amber's fault. We solve it by changing who holds the prime, not by hiding the relationships. Katie Belous (OEO Director) has explicitly encouraged us to find a way — this is the way.

The relationships, on the table

Pipeline founder
Chief of Staff, Governor Hobbs' Office. conflict Cannot direct grants to Pipeline.
Amanda (former Pipeline #2)
Director, Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO). Controls $$M-scale grant authority. conflict Cannot fund Pipeline directly. Actively seeking solutions she can fund.
Amber Smith
Current Pipeline CEO. Friend of Lucy. Asked to "save the ship" and told to position as vendor inside a broader solution. aligned
Lucy Howell / FFH
Independent operator. No COI with state government. prime-eligible

The play

  • FFH is the prime applicant on every Arizona public-sector pursuit (RHT, ACE, ABOR, OEO, USCCF re-applications).
  • Pipeline is a named subcontractor / data & catalog vendor with defined deliverables and a fixed budget line — not a co-equal applicant.
  • Burning Glass Institute / Lightcast (if used) sit one layer below as data and framework providers. This adds national legitimacy.
  • Amber sits at the AZ Chamber of Health Directors Table with Lucy — not as a Pipeline rep alone, but as a certified Force for Health Director representing the joint solution. This is the bridge Katie Belous can defend publicly.
  • Communications discipline: Pipeline's role is described in deliverables ("data integration, ECAP route-through, 300K-learner distribution"), not in dollars-to-Pipeline. The dollars route through FFH and the work product is contracted out under standard subgrant terms.

5The $1/Head Model — Where Pipeline Folds In

$1 per Arizonan × 7M residents = $7M annual baseline revenue. The print magazine to every AZ family is the universal touchpoint. STEAM TEAMS at $2,500 per high school is the depth activation. Pipeline's catalog becomes the "what comes next" route in every magazine, every classroom, every dashboard.

Revenue LineVolumeUnitYear-1 AZ Revenue
$1/Head Statewide License
Annual print magazine to every AZ family + platform access
~7M residents $1.00 $7,000,000
STEAM TEAMS Activation
Per-high-school activation across AZ (~280 HS public + private)
~280 schools $2,500 $700,000
Pipeline White-Label Continuity
Maricopa $8K/mo + Chandler/Mesa $1.2K/mo each + My Futures + sub-domains — kept whole and grown under co-brand
6+ instances varies ~$140,000
Chamber of Health Directors fees
County-level director seats co-branded FFH + Pipeline
15 counties varies TBD
Combined AZ Year-1 Revenue Target ~$7.84M

How the dollars flow to Pipeline

Why Amber should love this: Pipeline's current $1.5M annual burn is fully covered by FFH's prime contracts before a single new whitelabel sale. The funding cliff disappears. The 6.5 FTE keep their jobs. Amber gets to focus on platform improvement and rural reach, not survival fundraising.

6Cross-Train the Pipeline Team — Dual-Cert Force for Health Directors

Pipeline's 6.5 employees become the deepest bench of certified Force for Health Directors in the state. They keep their Pipeline scope. They add an FFH scope. Same people, two credentials, double the surface area.

Proposed seat assignments

Amber Smith — CEOCo-Director, AZ Chamber of Health Directors Table. Public face of the joint solution. Sits with Lucy on every state pursuit.
Rural Community Specialist (Nogales)FFH Director, Southern AZ & Tribal Nations. Anchors the rural health + workforce play, which is exactly what RHT and ACE want funded.
Tech / Platform leadFFH Integration Engineer. Owns ECAP ↔ Supabase data exchange + Lightcast API integration (or FFH-owned graph build, see §9).
Whitelabel account managersFFH Whitelabel Success Managers. Co-brand Maricopa, Chandler, Mesa instances; upsell FFH Academy modules.
Curriculum / pathway leadFFH Pathway & Credentialing Lead. Aligns Pipeline catalog with FFH micro-credentials and BGI Skills First framework.
Operations / fiscalJoint operations liaison. Manages subcontract reporting back to FFH prime and grant compliance.

Certification path

7My Healthy Arizona — The Co-Commercialization Vehicle

My Healthy Arizona is the consumer-facing brand for the joint solution. Underneath it: Pipeline's pathway catalog, FFH's health citizenship platform, and the AZ Healthcare Workforce Action Group's employer demand signal. The pilot proves the model. The equity sleeve makes it portable to every other state.

The architecture

Why this works for Pipeline specifically

Pipeline converts from a perpetually-grant-dependent nonprofit into an equity-bearing partner in a scalable for-profit platform without losing its mission. Pipeline's 300K-learner data set becomes the proof point that My Healthy Arizona can move from pilot to standard. When we replicate "My Healthy [State]" elsewhere, Pipeline rides along — they don't get left behind.

8Funding Roadmap — Bridge → Anchor → Scale

Three phases, three different funding vehicles, each unblocking the next. The total $7M+/yr AZ revenue target is reached by month 18. Pipeline is fully funded by month 6.

Phase 1 — Bridge (Now → Nov 2026)

Stop the cliff

Ask: $300K – $750K
  • RHT (Rural Health Tour) sponsorship — joint AZ rural activation with Nogales specialist as anchor; FFH prime, Pipeline catalog routing
  • Arizona ACE Initiative slot — joint pilot proposal targeting 3 counties Q3-Q4 2026
  • USCCF Pathways with Purpose re-application — refile with FFH as prime and Pipeline as named subcontractor (clears the BGI co-app issue cleanly); $295K–$365K already drafted
  • OEO directed solution — Katie Belous indicated openness; FFH applies, Pipeline is the workforce data sleeve
Phase 2 — Anchor (Nov 2026 → Mar 2027)

Lock in the state

Ask: $3M – $7M
  • ABOR / TRIF Tier 2 — Statewide PHIT for Arizona ($3M–$7M / 24 mo). Pipeline is the workforce-pipeline activation sleeve across ASU, NAU, UA
  • AMPLA alignment ($30M FY27 priority) — health-careers Pathway tools co-built by FFH Academy + Pipeline catalog
  • AFESF alignment ($10M) — STEAM TEAMS pipeline; Pipeline routes ECAP students into STEAM TEAMS activations
  • FFH Foundation STO — establish the FFH STO to capture $1M–$3M of AZ tax-credit-directed dollars; routes scholarships to Pipeline learners
Phase 3 — Scale (2027+)

Equity & multi-state

Ask: $10M+ + warrants
  • ABOR Tier 3 — PHIT National + Equity Sleeve ($10M+ / 36–60 mo). State takes equity-style position in My Healthy Globe Inc
  • $1M FFH SAFE raise closes; Pipeline anchor partners receive warrants in My Healthy Globe, Inc.
  • "My Healthy [State]" replication — TX, NV, NM, CO targets; Pipeline rides along as the workforce data partner
  • Acquisition / IPO path — Year-3 exit window opens; returns flow back to TRIF, AZ universities, and anchor partners

9Two Paths Forward — With Lightcast vs. Without

The labor-market data layer is a real budget decision. Path A licenses Lightcast (industry standard, fast credibility, recurring fee). Path B builds an FFH-owned skills + occupation graph from public sources (slower, but zero licensing and we own the IP). Below: pricing, pros, cons, and a recommended hybrid sequencing.

Lightcast pricing reality (what we know)

Lightcast does not publish enterprise/API pricing. Sales are quote-only. The one published price list we found (EDCC 2022) covers only the Analyst desktop tool:

Lightcast Analyst — Population TierSeats1-Year Annual2-Year Annual
0 – 50K population3$5,000$4,000
50K – 200K population3$8,000$7,000
200K+ population (Arizona = 7M)3$12,000$10,000

Add-ons (National Data, Profile Analytics, Business Listings) are priced separately. Enterprise API access, the Open Skills commercial license, and white-label integrations are quote-only — based on industry comps, expect $50K–$150K/yr for an enterprise API + skills taxonomy package at our scale. Skills Taxonomy commercial license alone typically lands $25K–$75K/yr.

Path A

With Lightcast — Licensed Industry-Standard Layer

Architecture: Lightcast Open Skills Taxonomy + Analyst tool + Enterprise API → Pipeline ECAP → FFH PHIT & Credentialing → My Healthy Arizona consumer brand. Burning Glass Institute Skills First Fellowship fully unlocked.

Analyst (3 seats, 200K+ tier)$10K – $12K
Skills Taxonomy commercial license~$25K – $75K
Enterprise API integration~$50K – $150K
Add-ons (Profile Analytics, etc.)~TBD
Estimated Year-1 cost~$85K – $250K

Pros

  • Industry-standard taxonomy: 2,000 occupations, 30,000 skills, 18B+ data points
  • Used by 44 of Fortune 50 + 67 of Fortune 100 — instant employer-side credibility
  • BGI Skills First Fellowship alignment is automatic (BGI uses Lightcast data)
  • Faster credentialing recognition with state and federal workforce systems
  • Real-time job postings + compensation data refreshed by Lightcast
  • Less platform dev work; license-and-go in <90 days

Cons

  • Recurring annual cost — never goes away, scales with usage
  • Vendor lock-in: same data many other partners can buy
  • No proprietary moat; can't be the differentiator we sell to investors
  • Multi-state replication compounds the cost (each new state = new license)
  • Pricing not transparent; renewals can spike
Path B

Without Lightcast — FFH-Owned Skills & Occupation Graph

Architecture: O*NET (free, federal) + BLS OEWS & QCEW + AZ DES feeds + Pipeline ECAP catalog data + FFH proprietary "skills-to-health-outcome" graph → unique credentialing layer → My Healthy Arizona. BGI alignment via framework/research participation only, not data licensing.

Data engineering FTE (1.0)~$120K – $160K
Skills graph build (Year 1, one-time)~$60K – $90K
Public data feed integration~$10K – $20K
O*NET / BLS / AZ DES licenses$0 (public)
Estimated Year-1 cost~$190K – $270K

Pros

  • Zero ongoing data licensing cost — Year 2+ COGS drops to maintenance only
  • FFH owns the IP — proprietary "skills-to-health-outcome" graph is a real moat
  • Multi-state replication is free at the data layer (TX, NV, NM, CO ride for nothing)
  • Stronger investor story: "we own the graph" drives valuation
  • Foundation can fund the build as workforce-equity research (grant-eligible)
  • No vendor renewal exposure

Cons

  • 6 – 9 months to build before credentialing is production-ready
  • Less industry-standard vocabulary; some employer/state systems prefer Lightcast tags
  • BGI Skills First Fellowship alignment requires negotiation (framework participation, not data integration)
  • Real-time job-posting freshness depends on what we scrape/license; not as deep as Lightcast's 18B data points
  • Higher Year-1 spend than Path A's low end ($190K vs $85K), though the curve crosses by Year 2
Recommended sequencing — the hybrid path

Stage it. Year 1 with Lightcast, Year 2 owned graph, Year 3 independent.

Year 1 (Bridge phase): License the Lightcast Analyst seats only (~$12K) to unlock BGI Skills First alignment and accelerate the first proof point with Pipeline. Skip the enterprise API and Skills Taxonomy commercial license at this stage — too expensive for what we'd do with them on a 12-month pilot.

Year 2 (Anchor phase): Use ABOR/TRIF Tier 2 dollars + SAFE raise proceeds to fund the FFH-owned skills graph build (~$200K, in-house). Run both stacks in parallel. By end of Year 2, our owned graph is primary; Lightcast becomes augmentation only.

Year 3 (Scale phase): Drop Lightcast entirely if our owned graph is performing. If still useful, keep Analyst seats at ~$12K/yr for benchmarking only. Replicate "My Healthy [State]" with zero incremental data-licensing cost.

Why this is the answer: We get Lightcast's credibility for the first proof point without the long-term lock-in or six-figure recurring fee. We bake the moat (FFH-owned graph) into the SAFE raise story. By the time we exit, we own the IP that makes us acquireable.

Decision impact for the working session: If Pipeline is locked into BGI/Lightcast through the Skills First Fellowship, Path A is the default Year 1 entry. Confirm with Amber whether the Fellowship is data-license-bound or framework-only — that determines whether we license $12K of Analyst, $50K+ of API, or skip Lightcast entirely.

10Decisions for the Working Session

Walk through these with Amber line-by-line. Each decision unlocks the next phase. Use the Notes panel on the right to capture answers as you go.

Working session checklist

  1. Confirm the prime/sub structure. FFH leads every public-sector AZ pursuit. Pipeline is named subcontractor with defined scope. Yes / No / Modify
  2. Confirm the $1.0M–$1.5M annual subcontract floor for Pipeline once Phase 1 funding lands, conditioned on agreed deliverables and dual-certification of staff. Yes / No / Modify
  3. Approve cross-training all 6.5 Pipeline employees as FFH Directors within 90 days. Yes / No / Modify
  4. Approve "My Healthy Arizona" as the joint consumer brand with Pipeline as a named anchor partner (and warrant-eligible) in My Healthy Globe, Inc. Yes / No / Modify
  5. Approve Amber's seat at the AZ Chamber of Health Directors Table as Co-Director with Lucy. Yes / No / Modify
  6. Pick a Lightcast path: Path A (license Year 1), Path B (own from Day 1), or Hybrid (recommended — Lightcast Analyst Y1 + FFH-owned graph Y2). Choose
  7. Confirm BGI Skills First Fellowship terms — is Pipeline's participation data-license-bound or framework-only? Determines Lightcast scope and budget. Confirm
  8. Phase 1 fundraising priority order — which to pursue first: RHT? ACE? OEO directed solution? USCCF re-application? Set the order today. Decide
  9. Joint AZ Chamber of Health Directors meeting date — set within 60 days. Invite Katie Belous + 1 ABOR rep. Set date
  10. Decision on Pipeline whitelabel co-branding — do existing Maricopa / Chandler / Mesa / My Futures instances get co-branded under FFH × Pipeline immediately, or after Phase 1? Decide
  11. Communications protocol re: COI — agree on language: "Pipeline is a named data and catalog vendor inside FFH-led Arizona initiatives." Lucy + Amber both use the same line. Approve
The bottom-line message to Amber: "We're not absorbing Pipeline. We're putting Pipeline inside an FFH-led prime structure that pays your bills, protects your founder's COI, gives your team a second credential, hands you equity upside, and turns your 300K learners into the proof case that takes 'My Healthy Arizona' national. You stay sovereign. We solve the cliff together."
⇆ Scroll horizontally to advance through sections · Press ESC to exit Slides View